http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-07-24/news/bs-md-gun-carry-permits-20120724_1_second-amendment-foundation-substantial-reason-discretion-of-local-authorities

Thank you Judge Legg. Finally someone realizes Maryland's law is beyond idiotic. I personally feel MUCH safer. (And yeah, if you're wondering, I fully plan on applying for a permit when I turn 18 and purchasing a handgun. Both of my parents have already expressed consent.)

(Edited for wrong link. I was so happy last night I put the google search link instead of the Baltimore Sun article.)

Well I'm glad they're overturning a law that seems stupid to you. I mean I hate that.

Yay, more people get guns

NGL Shush, you sig is kind of pissing me off lol

I didn't read it because I was too lazy, but judging from the posts and what you said. Basically what you're saying is that there are going to be more trigger-happy idiots running around?

I don't think the allowance of guns is the work of "the good lord". And I think it's pretty fucked up that you critisize things we like that become legal at 18 like tattoos, but no one gives you shit about how exited you are to own a gun.

Yes Im Am wrote:

Well I'm glad they're overturning a law that seems stupid to you. I mean I hate that.

...

Jshushij wrote:

Yay, more people get guns

No, more people will be rightfully allowed to carry them for self-defense. Lots of people already own handguns in Maryland.

I is beast wrote:

I didn't read it because I was too lazy, but judging from the posts and what you said. Basically what you're saying is that there are going to be more trigger-happy idiots running around?

Trigger-happy idiots...no. Not even close. What it means is that law-abiding citizens will be able to carry a handgun to protect themselves in the case that they run across a trigger-happy idiot. Criminals will still get the guns, and they have little regard for concealed carry laws. Especially Baltimore city criminals...

Victoria wrote:

I don't think the allowance of guns is the work of "the good lord". And I think it's pretty fucked up that you critisize things we like that become legal at 18 like tattoos, but no one gives you shit about how exited you are to own a gun.

I said thank the Lord. Didn't say it was his work. And come at me. Only you can change not giving me shit. I'm not gonna launch into a big rant.

K well I usually don't thank someone for something that has nothing to do with them, so I guess you can see where that would be confusing.

Victoria wrote:

K well I usually don't thank someone for something that has nothing to do with them, so I guess you can see where that would be confusing.

I guess I meant thank the good Lord above for implanting some common sense into one of our federal judges.

Therefore making it his work...

Einsteinean wrote:

Yes Im Am wrote:

Well I'm glad they're overturning a law that seems stupid to you. I mean I hate that.

...

I mean I hate stupid laws lol that was nothing against you

Ah, ok, my bad. Glad I didn't say anything worse.

Guns scare me

One of the few things I agree with my dad (and Ein) on. If someone wants a gun bad enough, a law against it will not stop them from getting it (ironically, Ein is against legalization of drugs which is the same concept).

Legalize pot. I'm perfectly fine with that. Cocaine, heroin and meth? Hell no. There are no reasonable benefits to those, I don't care who you are or what you think. It has been proven many, many times.

Do you think any of us here are trying to get fucking coke legalized? hahaha

Einsteinean wrote:

Yes Im Am wrote:

Well I'm glad they're overturning a law that seems stupid to you. I mean I hate that.

...

Jshushij wrote:

Yay, more people get guns

No, more people will be rightfully allowed to carry them for self-defense. Lots of people already own handguns in Maryland.

I is beast wrote:

I didn't read it because I was too lazy, but judging from the posts and what you said. Basically what you're saying is that there are going to be more trigger-happy idiots running around?

Trigger-happy idiots...no. Not even close. What it means is that law-abiding citizens will be able to carry a handgun to protect themselves in the case that they run across a trigger-happy idiot. Criminals will still get the guns, and they have little regard for concealed carry laws. Especially Baltimore city criminals...

Victoria wrote:

I don't think the allowance of guns is the work of "the good lord". And I think it's pretty fucked up that you critisize things we like that become legal at 18 like tattoos, but no one gives you shit about how exited you are to own a gun.

I said thank the Lord. Didn't say it was his work. And come at me. Only you can change not giving me shit. I'm not gonna launch into a big rant.

Ok thanks for clearing that up. I just didn't feel like reading any of that. LOL gratz though

Yes Im Am wrote:

Do you think any of us here are trying to get fucking coke legalized? hahaha

I'm just covering what is generally meant when someone says "drugs".

Well then what the fuck are you talking about because no on this forum said lets make drugs legal...just weed.

Tristan wrote:

One of the few things I agree with my dad (and Ein) on. If someone wants a gun bad enough, a law against it will not stop them from getting it (ironically, Ein is against legalization of drugs which is the same concept).

...?

No comment

Look, I apologize for taking stuff literally. But don't say drugs if you only mean weed. Damn.

you know me Ein

thank the lord for allowing you to kill someone if you need too? last time i checked it was was a sin to kill

*sigh* this thread has been COMPLETELY misconstrued. COMPLETELY.